A little while back in class we
watched the Case Study about the two Presa Canarios that attacked and killed
Diane Whipple. My mom just recently told me of a time where my parents were
being sued because of an almost similar incident. We own a rental house and the people who lived there had a dog (type is not really as
important). But the neighbor’s dog broke through the fence one day into our
yard and the dog that lived there attacked the intruding dog. The neighbor’s
dog ended up having to go to the vet and suffered some severe wounds. The lady
then sued us in a small claims court and was trying to get us to pay for the
full veterinary bill. Prior to this we had asked her to help us pay to fix the fence
since it was not only ours but hers as well and she refused. So at this point I
was convinced my parents were going to win. The lady had refused to let us fix
a fence that was broken; her dog came into our yard and attacked our dog first
but suffered more severe wounds. My parents went to court and the judge’s final
verdict greatly shocked me, they had lost. I guess the lady next door did such a good
job sympathizing with judge, she went up crying, totally broken down, and
claimed she was unable to afford the bill. From this I realized two things, the
justice system can be easily persuaded and maybe even biased, and also that owners of
dogs can be held responsible what for what their animals do.
Your point about the fairly easy persuasion of the justice system is scary to think about but makes a lot of sense. We hope that the justice system always finds justice, but as both Mr. Smith and Mr. Stewart have said the system is made up of people, and people are imperfect. As such there are cases where "truth" may be outweighed by acting, or, in more cases, money.
ReplyDelete